On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:42:53AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
John Darrington <[email protected]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 04:42:27PM +0100, bojo42 wrote:
> Oops, that celebration was a bit early, as the testsuite failed for
> nearly all architectures:
>
> I have a feeling that one of our problems may be Endiannes.
>
> mips: 78 179 180 181 182 183 184 308 439 440 837 922
> powerpc: 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 439 440 837 922
> s390: 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 439 440 837 922
> sparc: 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 439 440 837 922
>
> Would I be right in thinking these are all big-endian architectures?
You're right, those are all big-endian.I thought so. I pushed a change which hopefully will fix some of these issues. I've no way of actually testing it. J' -- PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://keys.gnupg.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
