On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:53:57AM -0800, Selma Leathem wrote:
The html looks great, but the pdf looks(pardon my french) crappy. I could
be wrong but it seems that there is no way to improve that any further. I
recall
reading somewhere on the internet that Texinfo is better when it comes to
HTML
documentation.
I've been doing some experiments. The problem with the pdf/dvi output is the
scaling of the images which has to be done. This produces anti-aliasing
artifacts which look odd especially when rendered text is involved.
I think to some extent this can be migigated by using other fonts for the
screenshots.
Anyway, Selma, do you want to create a branch and check in your work, or shall
I do it?
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://keys.gnupg.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
