Hi guys,

I would like to get the 0.8.5 version for mac (.dmg). Would you be so kind
to provide me a link to get that version. I will appreciate your help.

King regards.

Carlos



*Carlos González Haro**, PhD, MSc, BSc*
*Physical Fitness Coach / **Sport Physiologist / **Senior Sport Scientist*
*LinkedIn: *www.linkedin.com/in/carlosgonzalezharo


2015-07-31 8:47 GMT+02:00 Friedrich Beckmann <[email protected]>:

> Dear Douglas,
>
> thanks for the reply and the new bug descriptions regarding t-test groups
> and the regression command.
>
> I opened a bug in the bug database regarding the regression syntax:
>
> http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?45667
>
> The spss v23 syntax description
>
>
> ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/statistics/23.0/en/client/Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Statistics_Command_Syntax_Reference.pdf
>
> says that the groups command should separate the values with comma, but I
> guess you produced the syntax via the spss GUI, right?
>
> Regards
>
> Friedrich
>
> Am 31.07.2015 um 07:04 schrieb Douglas Bonett <[email protected]>:
>
> I am using version 22 of SPSS and it does not complain if I use CIN.
>
> I also noticed that SPSS V22 uses slightly different syntax for an
> independent samples t-test. SPSS produces:
>
> T-TEST GROUPS=group(1 2)
>
>   /MISSING=ANALYSIS
>
>   /VARIABLES=score
>
>   /CRITERIA=CI(.95).
>
>
> which PSPP does not like.  PSPP wants group(1,2) but SPSS does not
> complain with group(1,2).
>
>
> There seems to be more serious discrepancies between SPSS and PSPP syntax
> for linear regression. For a simple linear model SPSS produces
>
>
>
> REGRESSION
>
>   /MISSING LISTWISE
>
>   /STATISTICS COEFF OUTS CI(95) R ANOVA
>
>   /CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10)
>
>   /NOORIGIN
>
>   /DEPENDENT y
>
>   /METHOD=ENTER x.
>
>
> while PSSS gives
>
>
> REGRESSION
>     /VARIABLES= x
>     /DEPENDENT=     y
>     /STATISTICS=COEFF CI R ANOVA.
>
>
> SPSS V22 does not accept the PSPP regression syntax.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Friedrich Beckmann <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Dear Douglas,
>>
>> thank you for the bug report. I filed a bug in the bug database of pspp:
>>
>> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?45664
>>
>> As mentioned in the bug report the spss manual uses CIN in the examples.
>> Does your spss version complain if you use CIN instead of CI?
>>
>> Friedrich
>>
>> Am 30.07.2015 um 22:14 schrieb Douglas Bonett <[email protected]>:
>>
>>  PSPP uses CIN(.95) rather than CI(.95).  I hope this is a bug and not
>> intentional.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Friedrich Beckmann, Bismarckstraße 11, 86159 Augsburg
> Tel: 0821-44923693, Mobil: 017648576782
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pspp-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
pspp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev

Reply via email to