Hi, up to now I did a debian release for all released versions of pspp. I think a release in debian should be „better“ instead of different for the user. I guess a „non-tested snapshot“ does not qualify for this, right?
Friedrich Am 26.10.2015 um 07:04 schrieb John Darrington <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 04:36:39PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:04:30PM +0100, John Darrington wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:23:08AM +0100, Harry Thijssen wrote: >> Hi >> >> I would prefer if there is also a git tag for v0.8.6 this looks better to >> me. >> >> I think we should immediately update the version number to 0.9.1 since that >> is the convention what we (used to) use for non-tested snapshow versions. >> >> Ben, what do you think? > > I'm OK with that. (Why 0.9.1 instead of 0.9.0?) > > 0.9.0 is ok with me too. > > J' > > -- > Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encryted email. > PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 > fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 > See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key. > > _______________________________________________ > pspp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
