It would be worth a try. Could you provide me with a script for these tests and instruct me how to use it?
Have fun 2016-03-22 21:22 GMT+01:00 Ben Pfaff <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 09:04:07PM +0100, Harry Thijssen wrote: > > 2016-03-22 16:23 GMT+01:00 Ben Pfaff <[email protected]>: > > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 06:56:17AM +0100, John Darrington wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:55:19PM +0100, Harry Thijssen wrote: > > > > > Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:59:02 +0100 > > > > > From: John Darrington <[email protected]> > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > Subject: Running tests under wine. > > > > > > > > > > I pushed a change which allows many of the tests to run under > > > wine. > > > > > > > > > > make RUNNER=wine check > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried it and see the results below. Due to a patch of mine, > > > there should > > > > 1 tests and 1 failure added to the counts. > > > > Would the same trick work for some of the other executables > used in > > > the > > > > tests? > > > > > > > > Unfortunatey I don't think so. For two reasons: > > > > > > > > 1. We cannot "shadow" the pspp-convert command using a bash > function, > > > because > > > > bash functions cannot contain hyphens. > > > > > > pspp-convert is much less of a problem, because I only see a few calls > > > to it. It's easy enough to add $RUNNER directly to those. > > > > > > > 2. As discussed earlier, many of the other commands need to be > compiled > > > for the > > > > build machine rather than the host machine. This will require > > > significant > > > > rearrangement of the automake files. > > > > > > Yes, this is more of a problem. > > > > > > > > I did a quick check and found: > > datasheet-test.exe > > inexactify.exe > > sack.exe > > command-name-test.exe <http://lexer.at> > > scan-test.exe > > segment-test.exe > > abt-test.exe > > bt-test.exe > > cmac-aes256-test.exe > > encoding-guesser-test.exe > > heap-test.exe > > hmap-test.exe > > hmapx-test.exe > > i18n-test.exe > > line-reader-test.exe > > ll-test.exe > > llx-test.exe > > range-map-test.exe > > range-set-test.exe > > range-tower-test.exe > > sparse-array-test.exe > > sparse-xarray-test.exe > > stringi-map-test.exe > > stringi-set-test.exe > > string-map-test.exe > > string-set-test.exe > > str-test.exe > > tower-test.exe > > u8-istream-test.exe > > zip-test.exe > > chart-get-scale-test.exe > > chart-get-ticks-format-test.exe > > render-test.exe > > syntax-gen-test.exe > > > > Wouldn' t it work when $RUNNER is used in the calls for these programs? > > Maybe I can run a test a see how many of the tests complete then. > > That would probably help a great deal. > > It would be pretty easy to generate redirection scripts for these > programs, similar to how we generate redirection scripts when we run > "check-valgrind". That might solve most of the problems with > cross-checking. >
_______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
