Matej Kovacic <[email protected]> writes: >>>>> REGRESSION >>>>> /VARIABLES= F7 agea zenski >>>>> /DEPENDENT= C21 >>>>> /STATISTICS=COEFF R ANOVA. >>> BTW, I tried regression with PSPP and SPSS 13. There are slight >>> differences in output. And syntax in very different (does not cross run). >>> >>> SPSS 13 syntax: >>> >>> REGRESSION >>> /MISSING LISTWISE >>> /STATISTICS COEFF OUTS R ANOVA >>> /CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10) >>> /NOORIGIN >>> /DEPENDENT C21 >>> /METHOD=ENTER F7 agea zenski . >> >> I can run the SPSS syntax on PSPP, to see why PSPP does not like >> it. But I cannot run the PSPP syntax on SPSS, to see why SPSS >> does not like it. Can you tell me what SPSS does not like about >> the PSPP syntax? > > This is what SPSS (13) says: > ================ > Warnings > > Text: C21 > A variable was not named or implied on the primary variable list. > This command not executed. > > Misplaced subcommand on REGRESSION command--Only the METHOD subcommand > can follow a DEPENDENT subcommand. Text found: STATISTICS. > > *WARNING* REGRESSION syntax scan continues. Further diagnostics from > this command may be misleading - interpret with care. > ================
Jason, based on my reading of the SPSS syntax manual, it looks like PSPP isn't following the syntax very well. Are you planning to look into that at some point? -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org _______________________________________________ Pspp-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users
