[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels M�ller) writes:
> But I'm afraid that it would (i) violate the meaning of the spec,
> which explicitly says signal *number*, and (ii) be completely
> incompatible with the existing ssh2 implementation, which, I suspect,
> uses raw signal numbers without any translation at all.
How about:
Find out what "standard signals" ssh2 expects its raw signal numbers
to correspond to, and use a translation table. Translate to these raw
values before sending them over the wire, and translate from these raw
values into names/local values when you receive them over the wire.
