[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marc Haber) writes: > (2) It was an extremely dumb decision to make ssh2 incompatible and > make it use the same port since package maintainers usually don't > bother to make clear which version of the protocol they support. I don't think it was stupid to make it incompatible. Sometimes, you have to sacrifice backwards-compatibility for progress and simplicity. But I agree that that it would have made some things simpler if ssh2 had used a different port number. /Niels
- lsh with cygwin? Marc Haber
- Re: lsh with cygwin? Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh with cygwin? J.H.M. Dassen
- Re: lsh with cygwin? Marc Haber
- Re: lsh with cygwin? Kragen Sitaker
- Re: lsh with cygwin? Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh with cygwin? sthaug
- Re: lsh with cygwin? Jon Ribbens
- Re: lsh with cygwin? J.H.M. Dassen
- Re: lsh with cygwin? Marc Haber
