On 04 Jul 1999 16:51:07 +0200, you wrote:
>Either your zlib installation or lsh's configure script seem to be
>broken. Where is the zlib.h file located on your system?
|mh@torres[5/505]:/mnt/main6/home/mh$ ls -al /usr/include/zlib.h
|-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 40898 Oct 17 1998 /usr/include/zlib.h
|mh@torres[6/506]:/mnt/main6/home/mh$
>BTW2: I actually tried compiling lsh under cygwin some time ago, but
>didn't get further than compilation errors because I didn't have zlib
>installed. To get anything useful under w*ndows, I'd guess you also
>need some kind of terminal emulator.
I was thinking about using TeraTerm with lsh's port forwarding. A pity
that TeraTerm doesn't support ssh2. Anybody knows about a GPL'ed ssh2
client for Win32?
>Scsh is not free software, strictly speaking. scsh is not required to
>actually use lsh, but it is used to preprocess some of the C source
>files, so you need it if you want to hack lsh.
So I could compile it without scsh installed?
>I view this as a minor
>practical problem, because the scsh-folks doesn't seem to have any
>objections to this way of using scsh, and as a minor legal problem, as
>it should be straightforward to adapt the code to use some other
>scheme implementation.
The problem is the following: You'd want your package to be a Debian
package sooner or later. Depending on a non-free package like scsh,
lsh couldn't get into the main distribution. I see this as a problem
with Debian that could easily be fixed.
But if lsh can be compiled and used without scsh, the problem is taken
away IMO. But that's upon to the Debian people to decide.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29
