On 10/11/20 18:12, Daniele Varrazzo wrote:
Hello,
I have received some concerned voices in regard to have a package called
"psycopg3". I guess many have been burned out by the Python 2 to 3
transition, and now it's not a happy pair of number to see next to each
other. Sorry, Fibonacci...
The rationale behind having the 2 in the package name was to allow the
coexistence between v1 and 2. But now that nobody uses v1 anymore, I
think the name can be considered free. I believe it even predates pypi
and the requirements.txt convention. Dark times...
Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as
version number?
Seems fine to me.
federico
