Brian,

First of all, again, I'm not meaning to be rude either, but with all do 
respect, you completely! misunderstood the nature of my messages.  You totally 
red between the lines!

Never once did I mean to imply that Sonar would be more or less accessible for 
everyone.  If you read my mail again, you'll see that I said by far and away 
for quote: me! End quote, at least PT was more accessible.  I don't recall 
anywhere me saying it was more accessible over all or less for everyone and 
every need.

What exactly is it in PT that you're having issues with in the midi aspect.  
Maybe I just haven't yet ventured far enough along to understand, but thus far, 
I've had no issue at all doing midi on the PT side of things.

At this rate, this is going to turn into a list war flame.  I already can see 
it coming, so please from this point forward write me off list at

clgillan...@gmail.com

if you have any more comments/questions.  I'm not clutterring the list with 
this thread any longer.  I do however feel someone asked for input which I gave 
my opinion on, and I also feel in all do respect, you completely 
mis-interpreted the context of my msgs, but hey, that's ok, it won't be the 
first time anyone has done that, and honestly I'm sure it won't be the last.  
I'm willing to agree to respectfully disagree.

Chris.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Brian Casey 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 4:18 PM
  Subject: Re: Pro tools or Sonar?


  Hi Chris, 

  I'm not trying to say your wrong, but I think we need to be careful in saying 
which is more accessible, and its very dependent on someones needs/wants. 

  If someone wants to do a lot of midi stuff and audio in equal amounts or 
whatever, Sonar on a feature for feature basis would probably be technically 
more accessible depending on  the scripts being used. 
  Add to that the possibility of creating hot spot sets for jaws and it 
presents very different accessability to ProTools. 

  So I'm not saying your wrong but its not a simple black or white issue. 

  Perhaps you didn't take to the way things were done in sonar, as you seem to 
be taking to ProTools like a duck to water, but many make a living and achieve 
success with sonar, so you know, lets try to give as full a picture as possible 
to anyone trying to make a decision on what is a relatively big 
investment/commitment. 

  I'm glad you feel the way you do about PT though, I wasn't as posative, but I 
didn't have a chance to throw myself into it fully and reading about your quick 
learning on it and excitement about the platform gives me hope that I'll at 
least learn PT as another skill in my bag of tricks some time in  the near 
future. 


  Brian.


  From: Christopher-Mark Gilland 
  Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 8:03 PM
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Subject: Re: Pro tools or Sonar?


  In a lot of ways, I personally find it to be as accessible, if not more.

  Chris.

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Pino Guarraci 
    To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
    Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:41 AM
    Subject: Re: Pro tools or Sonar?


    Hello Chris,

        I agree with you but do you think that Protools is even accessible as 
Sonar?

        Regards,

    Pino
    www.studiocrescendo.be
    www.proguide.eu
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Christopher-Mark Gilland 
      To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
      Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 2:18 PM
      Subject: Re: Pro tools or Sonar?


      For one thing, do realize that on the Windows side of things, ProTools is 
going to be almost useless.  

      If you get a mac, it works almost flawlessly.  I would recommend PT by 
far and away over Sonar!  The effects are way better, the sound is way better, 
and honestly, over all things I find at least, are just way easier to do in PT 
in a whole.  Plus, Sonar is not industry standard, where as ProTools is.

      Any good major recording studio is going to have most likely one, if not 
more, ProTools systems that they can use.

      So ultimately, I'd suggest PT, but that is me.

      Chris.

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: stuart young 
        To: 'ptaccess@googlegroups.com' 
        Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 7:51 AM
        Subject: Pro tools or Sonar?


        Hi all.

        I am going to be setting up a small recording studio with in the next 6 
months or so and I am currently doing some research in to which digital audio 
work station to use. I have decided to use either Pro tools, or Sonar, but I 
thought that I would first ask on this list if anyone has had experience in 
using either product, and what were there thoughts on using each one.

        Many thanks for your help on this, regards.

        Stuart Young

        Learning Support Unit

        The West of England School and College

        Countess Wear

        Exeter

        Devon

        EX2 6HA

        Tel: 01392 454223

        Website: http://www.westengland.ac.uk/

        Email: syo...@westengland.ac.uk

        Charity Number: 1058937

         

        The information in this email and any files transmitted with it may be 
of a confidential nature and are intended solely for the addressees. If you are 
not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to 
the email and then delete it without making copies or using it in any way. The 
West of England School and College has taken reasonable precautions to ensure 
that this message has been checked for viruses before transmission. However, 
you are strongly advised to carry out your own virus scan before any opening 
any attachments. The West of England School and College accept no 
responsibility for loss or damage caused by software viruses. 

Reply via email to