Very diplomatically put, Chris. I’m currently having an issue registering PT11, but when I get this issue sorted, the next issue I’m probably going to have is authorising the product on my ILOK. We’ll see how that goes when I attempt it.
> On 25 Nov 2014, at 15:33, Christopher-Mark Gilland <clgillan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Is the Ilok Manager still not accessible? I've not had a need to try it in > quite some time, but here in the next couple months, there are some plugins > that I really highly am considerring either purchasing, or asking for for > Christmas. The only thing is, they use ILok. My mom has very very gladly > agreed to help me get things transferred if needed, bless her heart, but it > really would be nice if I didn't have to rely on her each time I need > something done. I know we were working closely with Pace Antipiracy, so was > just wonderring how responsive they're being, if any. I'm not saying I've > totally lost all hope, as I most certainly haven't. This however said, I > really really think we need to continue letting them know how crutially > important this is! When PT 11 was first released, I understand that they had > a lot of things on their plate at that time, as they needed to be sure that > licensing worked in general with the new PT 11, which I'm sure behind the > scenes took quite some time and testing. Let's be 100 percent fair. They had > bigger things on them at that time than to really worry right then about > accessibility issues. I'm not saying that it's an excuse to totally deny > accessible access. Please please please! don't misread what I am trying here > to say. All I'm saying is, it took a back seat. And, you know, ok, that's > fair. They did indeed have other things they had to deal with. I'm very much > willing to respect that fact. Actually, I'm willing to respect it more than > I initially anticipated that I would be. This said however, we're a fair > ways now into the 11.X cycle. I'm not exactly sure what the most recent 11 > build is, Last I knew, I think it was like, 11.2, wasn't it? Anyway, point > is, I think they've had some time now to probably settle a bit down with > stuff. Again, don't misinterpret what I'm trying here to convey. I'm not > saying that accessibility shouldn't be a priority. It should be! I just > wonder if we're at a stable enough point where we can start contacting them > again to figure out what is going on, and make sure they've not forgotten us. > I love ProTools, but this is the one pet peeve that I have which really > irritates me to absolutely no end! > > Chris. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
