Hey Slau. this is great. Thanks for this. Steve

> On 24 Apr 2017, at 4:31 am, Slau Halatyn <slauhala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Steve,
> 
> It's difficult to answer an "is it worth it" kind of question because it 
> involves "worth" which translates into money and not everybody thinks the 
> same in terms of dollars or whatever currency. Before I offer an opinion, 
> first let me say that Flo Tools offers access to UI elements within Superior 
> Drummer II which is the only version you can currently buy. While Superior 
> Drummer does have MIDI loops available, the browser is not currently 
> accessible. Therefore, one must program drums manually. Manual drum 
> programming is not for everyone and, even for those who do it, for some it 
> comes easy and for others it's somewhat time-consuming. If one knows how to 
> play drums or knows how drummers play, it's a fairly straight-forward matter 
> of playing parts on pads or keyboard. Superior Drummer comes with one library 
> and there are about a dozen other Superior Drummer libraries with the letters 
> SDX before the library name. Superior can also play Easy drummer libraries of 
> which there are dozens and those have an EZX in front of the library name. 
> Superior Drummer costs around $300 but it often goes on sale for $199 or less 
> and that includes the default Avatar library. The SDX expansions cost around 
> $150 each but they sometimes go on sale for half price. The EZX libraries 
> cost around $100 but also go on sale for half price perhaps once a year or so.
> 
> So, all told, you might spend as little as $150 or as much as a thousand 
> dollars, depending on when and what you buy. It's hard to say whether it's 
> worth it. To me, it's undoubtedly the best sounding virtual drum library out 
> there. I've heard pretty much all of them and, while some are great, I think 
> Superior Drummer is a cut above. Now that it's fairly accessible in Pro 
> Tools, I think it's a great way to go if you're adept at programming drum 
> parts.
> 
> HTH,
> Slau
> 
>> On Apr 22, 2017, at 4:59 PM, Steve Sparrow <i...@sparrowsound.com.au 
>> <mailto:i...@sparrowsound.com.au>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi guys i know this is going back a while now, how ever i’m thinking about 
>> purchasing superior drummer, I’ve just reread the below email. 
>> is this the best accessible solution for us to create drum tracks using  p 
>> t. How well does this work. what version of superior drummer is this 
>> compatible with. is it superior drummer 2 how easy is this to use, and is 
>> this a good solution. Sorry a few questions. I guess to sum up is this worth 
>> getting.
>> Steve
>> 
>> .
>> 
>>> On 29 Dec 2016, at 8:48 am, Slau Halatyn <slauhala...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:slauhala...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> For those not sharing in the Drop Box for bandwidth concerns, here 
>>> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/6f8s5fhmuiy08y9/Plug-In%20Views%20shared.zip?dl=1>
>>>  are the initial plug-in view files for Superior Drummer. Also, here 
>>> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/lb5p4jn2hskzq76/Superior%20Drummer%202%20Project%20Presets.zip?dl=1>
>>>  are a bunch of multi-out files that Phil Muir created. 
>>> Long story short (and you'll have to fill in some blanks as I'm in a bit of 
>>> a rush right now), if you want to use Phil's multi-out routings:
>>> Instantiate Superior on  a stereo  instrument track.
>>> Use Control plus the arrow keys to navigate to the Load/Save menu and 
>>> select "Load."
>>> Navigate to one of Phil's multi SD2 files and make sure it's a library that 
>>> you own and load it.
>>> Create 15 stereo aux tracks.
>>> Interact with the input of the first aux track and, with 
>>> Command+Option+Shift pressed,  set it to Plug-In>Superior Drummer Insert 
>>> A>bus 3-4.
>>> 
>>> Now any sequence on the Instrument track will be split out to kick in, kick 
>>> out, sub kick, snare top, snare bottom, etc.
>>> 
>>> This is a very quick and dirty explanation but that's the basic story. Phil 
>>> might chime in with more of a description and possibly paste in the text of 
>>> the document he created explaining the routing and what's on each set of 
>>> busses.
>>> 
>>> Later,
>>> slau
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>> <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to