HAe SLau; FOr me i do not use these shortcuts with control at all. so, have no mind if they disappeared.
> On Mar 11, 2022, at 2:12 AM, Slau Halatyn <slauhala...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As we prepare the next version of Flo Tools, the Flo Tools Team is pondering > a particular set of features and wondering whether we should keep them, > discard them or just change the implementation just a bit. > > There are 5 keyboard shortcuts with single and double-tap version s that list > things like Soloed tracks, muted tracks, armed tracks etc. Double-tapping > lists the unsoloed, unmuted, unarmed tracks, etc. In each case, depending on > the single or double tap, you get one or the other version of the list and > can toggle the status of the listed tracks individually. The modifier > combination includes Control+Shift along with letter keys: S for solo, M for > mute, R for record arm, K for input monitoring and L for track selection. > > The next release of Pro Tools will use two keyboard shortcuts that'll > conflict with two of the Flo Tools shortcuts. Since we try to keep modifier > combinations consistent, we'd be hard pressed to come up with combinations > for the included letters that don't conflict with other Pro Tools commands. > > Therefore, we're evaluating whether or not this listing feature is worth > keeping or not. Personally, I've never used this feature but some people > might feel it's indispensable for their workflow. we also don't necessarily > have to ditch the feature itself but rather transform it into a single > keyboard shortcut that would bring up one extra step where users can choose > which filter type they'd like, press that button and then be presented with > the resulting list just as they have in the past. It is an extra step but > only one shortcut to remember. > > So, we're asking for feedback from Flo Tools users for the following: > > Do you feel that the listing feature is something you use often? Is it > something you'd really like to continue being part of Flo Tools or are you > indifferent? Again, we could probably implement an intermediate dialog to > facilitate the feature itself in a similar way but, before we put in the time > and effort, we'd like to make sure enough people truly want it to stay. > Otherwise, we're all about streamlining if it makes sense. > > Please feel free to respond here and we'll make note of general sentiment. > > Thanks! > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/1B0BEBC7-C0EF-4CE0-8A8A-D76EFF2882E9%40gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/FBC6C35F-7ED0-47A3-B32B-4C3D20E4D131%40gmail.com.
