Interesting take on wireless interference from the National
Association of Broadcasters.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Harold Feld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 9:08 AM
Subject: [CWN-Summit] Who knew physics was so pro-incumbent?
To: Network Summit Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


So according to the NAB:

High power devices operated by political allies don't cause interference.
But low-power smart devices operated by community wireless networks do.
http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1823

Who knew physics was so pro-incumbent?

Last chance to get white spaces approved here in the U.S., and
hopefully spark interest in opening these frequencies internationally.
 If you are here in the U.S., please go to the Free Press Action page.
https://secure.freepress.net/site/Advocacy?JServSessionIdr001=msmptj5tl5.app43b&cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=273

Harold

_______________________________________________
CWN-Summit mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/cwn-summit



-- 
Michael Weinberg
President
Personal Telco Project, Inc.
A 501(c)(3) Non-Profit

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
The Personal Telco Project - http://www.personaltelco.net/
Donate to PTP: http://www.personaltelco.net/donate
Archives:  http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireless.portland.general/       
                                        
Etiquette: http://www.personaltelco.net/index.cgi/MailingListEtiquette
List information: http://lists.personaltelco.net
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to