Remy Bohmer wrote: > Hello Robert, > >> Is there a reason to have more than one version in ptxdist at one time? >> If not, we shouldn't make it configurable, because maintenance effort >> explodes then. If yes, it can be done. Note that, if a new version is >> available, it can be changed in the .make file. But making it >> configurable suggests that projects may work with any possible version. > > OK, I will change it. > >>> Can I have access somehow to the git tree? That would be easier to >>> develop and provide patches. >> Marc has his own git tree and shadows the svn. >> http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=mkl/ptxdist;a=summary > > Is there a clone url ?
git://git.pengutronix.de/git/mkl/ptxdist >>> Just curious, why is there an SVN tree if you are developing the tree >>> with git anyway? >> ptxdist is developed with svn since ages. git is shiny and new and has >> it's own class of possibilities and problems. People are free to use it, >> but the central repository remains svn for now. > I did not ask you to move to git... > I just thought it was currently the opposite around, that the svn tree > was generated from git these days... My mistake. If we decide to switch to git, then svn will probably be switched off. But until then svn is the reference. Only what is in svn counts. :) git is decentralized which is good but also has IMHO some bad aspects..... Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de
