Wolfram Sang wrote: >> However busybox uses "strip <input> -o <output>" during strip, to create >> the stripped variant. Our dummy strip doens't support the '-o' option. >> >> This is why busybox fails withs: >> >> ptxdist: Discarding 'strip -s --remove-section=.note >> -remove-section=.comment busybox_unstripped -o busybox' >> >> This patch add support for '-o' to strip. > > Hmm, that means we have a stripped binary when not using cross-toolchains and > an unstripped one if using the host-toolchain. I wouldn't say this is a > show-stopper, but maybe we can additionally convince busybox to not strip? And > then strip ourselves at the targetinstall stage as usual?
Yes, that should be possilbe. cheers, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- ptxdist mailing list [email protected]
