David Lightstone wrote: > I am doing a rebuild per suggestion right now. > > There are 2 possibilities to consider > (1) As I understand the make / automake strategy, There must be a > development environment check somewhere which serves to establish > satisfaction of the non-hack solution (having the development package for > zlib installed). Its either that or the config option --with-system-zlib > is a deliberate override of that process. (Is the config process for gcc > obligated to check for consistency) > > If gcc is not intended to perform such a check, This would beg the question > - should ptxdist checks for consistency between the rules and the > development environment? > > (2) I observe zlib-1.2.5 to be present in directory build-host. Quite > possibly it is intended as the non-hack solution. (if so, should it be in > the include path?). It certainly contains zlib.h. Should it be in the > include file path somewhere?
Hmm, as the toolchain should run later on on your host, using the local zlib might not be a good idea. But currently I also do not know, why the zlib is required. jbe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert | Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | Phone: +49-8766-939 228 | Vertretung Sued/Muenchen, Germany | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de
