Hi Bernhard, On 23.01.2012 14:07, Bernhard Walle wrote: > * Andreas Bießmann <biessm...@corscience.de> [2012-01-23 13:40]: >> >> shouldn't we build two different packages (u-boot-tool-mkimage, >> u-boot-tool-env) here? > > I would add that tools as part of the u-boot package. > > Mixing a host tool with target tools don't sound like a good idea.
no, you got me wrong here. We have a host-u-boot-tools package which have the mkimage build for the host (currently only that tool, but maybe sometimes mkenvimage too?). Here we have the target package build for the specified target architecture (yes some want to run mkimage ion the target ;) My question here is, should we provide a u-boot-tool-mkimage-<target arch>.ipkg and u-boot-tool-env-<target arch>.ipkg here rather than a u-boot-tools-<target arch>.ipkg which includes mkimage/fw_printenv depending on the configuration. best regards Andreas Bießmann -- ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de
