On 03/05/2014 11:37 AM, Alexander Aring wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:48:54AM +0100, Michael Olbrich wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 09:48:47AM +0100, Alexander Aring wrote:
>>> I see you applied other patch "libzmq: add new package" already. Is
>>> there something wrong with this patch or simple needs a little more time
>>> to review? :-)
>>
>> I need some clarification mostly. You're replacing the whole build-system.
>> That's not something I want to maintain inside ptxdist. I can only accept
>> that if this will be upstream the next time we update the package in
>> ptxdist. So what's the upstream status of these patches?
>>
> Maintainer don't want to use automake in his buildsystem, I think it
> will never go into mainline of libcoap. There is also no mailinglist for
> this project, I mailed with the maintainer private.

What about cmake?

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
ptxdist mailing list
ptxdist@pengutronix.de

Reply via email to