Hello, Am Freitag, 7. September 2018, 12:01:05 CEST schrieb Michael Olbrich: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 10:39:27AM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: > > This fixes the case for PTXDIST_BSP_AUTOVERSION returning things like > > ????.??.?-?-gcb7418a2299c-dirty when the last tag in the BSP was only a > > lightweight one, no annotated tag. > > Nack. Using only annotated tags is a deliberate choice we made. Changing > this would break all kinds of existing use-cases.
Okay, I'm fine with that. I will just have to remember that, when creating tags in a BSP. Or maybe I can even make use of it. > I think it would be ok to make this optional (opt-in) in the script. And > then define a custom ptxd_bsp_autoversion() in your BSP to enable this. That's why I tagged this RFC. No need to add additional complexity here. Thanks for your answer. :-) Greets Alex _______________________________________________ ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de
