On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 02:36:32PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 01:22:04PM +0200, Roland Hieber wrote:
> > Felicitas has spent a good amount of time adding missing <PKG>_LICENSE
> > and <PKG>_LICENSE_FILES variables to (mostly older) package rules. I've
> > looked over her series, and there were some remaining Makefile syntax
> > errors, which I've fixed, and I also did a review of those rules that
> > failed during the build. For the other rules, I'm trusting her legal
> > expertise :-) While at it, I also fixed some issues which I discovered
> > on the way.
> > 
> > With this series, 93% of all target package rules now have license
> > information, which is an increase of 18%.
> > 
> > Since this series consists of 169 patches, I'm rather submitting it as a
> > pull request than single patch mails.
> 
> So, I've started reviewing this. For all patches: please replace 'unknown'
> with 'custom' as discussed elsewhere.
> I've reviewed for argtables2 to libmemcached so far. I've queued the
> patches that are ok. They should hit master soon, so you can rebase the
> rest.
> Unless I have an explicit comment or 'unknown' is used, the patch is ok.
> 
> The following patches need improvements:
> 
> - argtables2:
>   the source files say LGPL-2.0-or-later
> - memstat:
>   It just says 'GPL' without any license text. I'm not comfortable with
>   GPL-1.0-or-later for this. Maybe put it in staging? It's really old and
>   has not been touched in a long time.
> - ckermit:
>   A copyright statement of one of the source files should be added

memstat and ckermit have since been removed from PTXdist.

> - db:
>   src/clib/qsort.c and others look like BSD-4-Clause to me
> - grep:
>   the source files say GPL-3.0-or-later
> - gtk2:
>   the source files say LGPL-2.0-or-later
> - jvisu:
>   I think this is "GPL-2.0-only AND (GPL-2.0-only WITH eCos-exception-2.0)"

Is this used at all anymore? The last version is from 2007, and the
homepage at <http://www.jvisu.com> no longer exists…

> - libcaca:
>   again, -or-later for the GPL licenses, I think
> - libgsf:
>   typo in the subject: s/libsgf/libgsf/

Thanks. I've started going over the series again, and found a few other
issues. It's a rather tedious process…

I think it's best to split this up into a few smaller series that can be
reviewed easier and applied faster, so the heap of unapplied patches at
least gets smaller over time.

 - Roland

-- 
Roland Hieber, Pengutronix e.K.          | r.hie...@pengutronix.de     |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                     | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686         | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
ptxdist mailing list
ptxdist@pengutronix.de
To unsubscribe, send a mail with subject "unsubscribe" to 
ptxdist-requ...@pengutronix.de

Reply via email to