On Wed, 31 May 2006 23:45:04 +0200, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2006 01:33:14 +0200, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | 5.7.3. The :-xbl-bound-element Pseudo-Class
> |
> | ISSUE-V Should add a forward reference to section 5.10.
>
> Why?
Because that section explains the "loop effect" with :-xbl-bound-element
and :-xbl-binding...
I don't see anything in section 5.10 that mentions :-xbl-bound-element.
Am I missing something?
Check the last two paragraphs. They talk about loops (:hover is one
example). This applies to :-xbl-bound-element and -xbl-binding as well.
The basic problem is that listening for specific events is not
guarenteed to work cross-platform given that some devices might not
dispatch certain events, like some of the mouse events...
Sure, but why is that XBL2's problem?
Well, the problem applies to more than XBL, fair enough, but pointing such
things out to authors might benefit. Those notes don't have to be
normative or anything...
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
