Hi, Ian- Ian Hickson wrote: | | XBL2 is based on discussion and listening to a broad range of | inputs. It's one of the most openly discussed specs | that is currently being driven by the W3C -- all discussion | since late last year has been on public lists, both | before and after being in the W3C
I understand that this spec has been discussed extensively elsewhere, but not very much so on this list. You have stated your conclusions, but not any evidence leading up to them; I'm sure this evidence exists, so I would appreciate a pointer to any substantive technical discussions that indicate why XPath should not be a selector option for XBL2. Regards- Doug
