On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:50:30 -0700, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Second, a pseudo-class ':xbl-bound-element' that matches an XBL bound > > element. > > Can't we make that ':bound-element'? And let other binding languages, if > ever, reuse that pseudo-class just as they can reuse the proposed > 'binding' property? Would make sense to me.
I would be fine with that, if the rest of the community is ok with it. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
