On Sep 8, 2006, at 04:58, Mark Baker wrote:
So, what might the good reasons be not to define an XBL2 media type?
XBL2 can work without a media type of its own. Hence, it will be served as application/xml anyway. Therefore, anyone who wishes to see if something is XBL2 needs to look inside application/xml documents anyway. And new media types are not free of cost to everyone who has to think about them, configure them and code for them.
-- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
