On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Are there specific requirements for authoring tools that the WG didn't > think about? It's one of the reproaches made to W3C on a regular basis. > If there are such requirements, please say so.
It isn't clear to me how we can mention comments that we didn't think about. We didn't think about them, by definition. Could you detail exactly what text you would like us to add which would satisfy your comment? Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
