On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Karl Dubost wrote:
> Le 06-10-06 à 09:51, Ian Hickson a écrit :
> > On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > [[[
> > > XBL user agents that support CSS should act as if they had the following
> > > rules in their UA style sheet:
> > >
> > > @namespace xbl url(data:,520e273a-62ad-4528-bb1e-9652bda76d62);
> > > xbl|* { display: none; }
> > > ]]] -- XML Binding Language (XBL) 2.0
> > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060619/#xbl-elements
> > > Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:27:58 GMT
> > >
> > > It seems that url() is at risk from their specification.
> > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-css3-namespace-20060828/#syntax
> >
> > Yeah, that's an error in the CSS3 Namespaces draft.
>
> What is an error?
> - url() will be dropped
> - string will be dropped
> - both will be authorized?
The error is that the namespaces draft deprecates features that it
introduces. Both url() and string are to be allowed. (They have to be, for
compatibility with existing content.)
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
