Hi-
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Doug Schepers wrote:
I would like to request an extension of the XBL2 LC period. I apologize
for the inconvenience, but I suspect many people have been very busy
with recent W3C activities (several of the SVG WG, for example), and for
my own part, I have had (and will have) tight work schedules leading up
to the holidays.
I think that on the whole, the specification is technically sound (if
terse), and does not need substantial revision. However, I would like
the opportunity for myself and particularly those who invested time in
the sXBL specification to give a thorough review.
I think that mid to late January would provide ample time for this, and
would not unduly delay the specification.
That would be fine by me.
Thanks, Ian. Assuming that the rest of the WAF WG is fine with this, I
will plan on getting a solid review in by early-mid January. I hope to
have some free time coming up after/during the holidays during which I
can aid in the primer, too. And the *shudder* test suite.
Regards-
-Doug
Research and Standards Engineer
6th Sense Analytics
www.6thsenseanalytics.com
mobile: 919.824.5482
