Hi. This is a last call comment on the XBL 2 Editor’s Draft (dated 27 October 2006).
The document is currently (understandably) biased towards ECMAScript. Some parts however, such as section 5.4, are described only in terms of how ECMAScript is supported. There should be language in there to guide implementors on how to support other scripting languages (for example on how the public/private implementation objects should look in general). Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
