On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 22:36:41 +0100, Cameron McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
This is a last call comment on the XBL 2 Editor’s Draft (dated 27
October 2006).
I’d just like to confirm that CSS support is not required for a
conforming XBL implementation. I can imagine for example SVG Tiny 1.2
implementations that implement XBL 2.0 but not mandating CSS support,
and I wouldn’t want those invalidated.
What makes you think it is? (It's not required, nor is ECMAScript.
Selectors is.)
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
