On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, ¹õß·¹ä»Ö(KUROSAWA, Takeshi) wrote: > > I think the XBL 2.0 should define a unique string for the SVG Feature > String [1], the DOMImplementation.hasFeauture[2] and such things. # the > namespace for the XBL 2.0?
Agreed. Added. (Although, to comply with the SVG specification, I added a requiredExtension URI based on the namespace, with a version suffix, rather than using the namespace URI as a feature string.) Let me know if that's acceptable! Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
