After reading the spec further this section is now clear to me. No further action needed:) Marcos
-----Original Message----- From: Ian Hickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 5 January 2007 3:13 PM To: Marcos Caceres Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [XBL] clarification: explicit children must be redistributed? On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > Can you please add a little more detail to clarify how point 6 in > Section 3.5 works. It currently reads: > > If the new binding changes which shadow trees contribute to the final > flattened tree then the explicit children must be redistributed. > > I've read section "processing content elements", but I am still a bit > unclear about how this step works. I don't really understand what isn't clear... Could you describe to me what your interpretation of that sentence is, so that I can work out what it is that needs changing/improving? Thanks, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
