Much better, thanks! Marcos
-----Original Message----- From: Ian Hickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 6 January 2007 6:28 AM To: Marcos Caceres Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [XBL] Editorial: legibility in section 3.7.1 On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > In section 3.7.1, the following is a bit convoluted: > "1. If the binding is attached to the bound element because another > binding is inheriting from it using the extends attribute, then, for > this instance of the binding on this bound element, repeat this process > with the derived binding instead." > > Can you please make it a bit more legible, or maybe add an "for example, > ..." or something. I've tried rephrasing the algorithm. Let me know if it's better now. Thanks, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
-- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
