On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Cameron McCormack wrote: > > 3.10 Binding Detachment Model > > Then, shadow tree must be removed, the implementation must be removed > from the bound element’s list of binding implementations… > > s/shadow/the shadow/
Fixed. > If the binding had an extends attribute when it was bound to the > element (it may have changed since then), then the user agent must > then detach the binding that was attached because of that attribute > (if any). > > Does this mean the detachments must happen according to the value of the > extends attribute at the time it was originally bound? Is that not > inconsistent with what happens with binding when the extends attribute > is modified? (It may not be inconsistent, since I don’t fully > understand 3.7.1.) Clarified. Please let me know if the next text is any better. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
