Ian Hickson a écrit :
On 1/9/07, Cyril Concolato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As far as I can tell, the statement in the XBL spec is the same as
in the
SVG spec.
The second sentence is wrong for SVG documents. The SVG specification
explains the opposite in
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/linking.html#externalReferences.
"The conceptual model is that each resource document is loaded only
once;
if the same resource document is referenced multiple times directly or
indirectly by the same primary document, that resource document is only
retrieved and processed one time."
That's not the opposite of what XBL says. That's exactly what XBL
says. Unless I made a mistake in the XBL spec, at any rate. Which is
the sentence in the XBL spec that disagrees with this?
"Nested documents and images do not share binding documents with each
other or with their container document."
That sentence was saying "resources" instead of "binding documents" and
was then disagreeing. Now, it's fine.
I think that with the latest fixes, the whole section 8.1.1 is right,
except that you could move the sentence "Binding documents that are
currently loading count as binding documents that are already loaded for
the purposes of this reuse mechanism." at the end of the section since
the example below illustrates the sharing part and not the loading part.
Concerning section 8.1.2, I'm not sure I agree. What are the cases that
are covered by this sentence: "When the specification simply says that
the external resource must be loaded" ?
Regards,
Cyril
