Ian Hickson: > So I did some research, and ECMA 262 does have getters and setters. They > just haven't actually made it all the way through ECMA's standardisation > process yet. I've added a link to drafts of ECMA262-4 to the spec. I've > also clarified that while the examples use getters and setters, this > doesn't imply that they must be supported (or indeed that JS at all must > be supported, in any version).
Ok, thanks. > We need getters and setters for XBL2, otherwise we can't do attributes, > which is a rather critical requirement. I don't really have a better > suggestion. I agree that getters and setters make for much nicer implementation objects. -- Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
