On 1/12/07, Bjoern Hoehrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Mark Baker wrote:
>I agree that the change in terminology is a concern though.  I suppose
>the proper thing to do would be for the WG to ask the TAG for
>clarification.

Note http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2006Sep/0059.html to
which no one responded. I would take this as silent agreement and move
on.

I can't find where it says that silence implies agreement in their
charter.  Would a friendly "ping" be so burdensome?

Mark.
--
Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.         http://www.markbaker.ca
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies  http://www.coactus.com

Reply via email to