On 1/22/07, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, Innovimax SARL wrote:
>
> In http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xbl-20070117/
>
> ==Normative Reference==
> Third edition of XML instead of fourth
> First edition of XMLNS instead of second
Fixed.
> ==Inconsistencies==
> evtGroup, but eventPhase
That's not XBL's fault, that's just how DOM Events has it.
> initialize, initialized but initialisation
Fixed.
> focussed and focused are both used
Fixed.
> In 4.9.1. General Rules
> html:label, html:img and html:map but img, map and title (I understand
> non namespaced element in the document are in the XBL namespace)
Fixed where potentially ambigious.
> ==Strange point==
> In 1.4.3. Attributes Containing Space-Separated Values
> It's unclear to me wether you are speaking about before XML character
> normalisation or after. In either case, it seems flawed
> If it is before, to be consistent with XML behaviour, you missed the
> TAB (0x9) char in the space definition
> If it is after, all the 0xA, 0xD no more exist and have been replaced
> by 0x20 (see 3.3.3 Attribute-Value Normalization in XML)
It is after, because XBL is layered on top of the DOM, which itself is on
top of XML, and therefore the XML rules have already been applied by the
time XBL has anything to do with the content. However, it is still
possible to have U+000A and U+000D characters in attributes, both by using
entities in XML, and by directly putting such character data in the
attribute using the DOM.
Ok I see, but then what is the special meaning of 0x9 to not be
treated as space ?
> ==Schematas==
> It seems, the grammar of a valid xbl document is difficult to explain
> in DTD or XML Schema.
> Is it planned to provide a Relax NG+Schematron or even an NVDL for it ?
There is no plan to make an official schema for XBL.
> ==Typo==
> s/favourite/favorite/
> s/Feburary/February/
> s/instace/instance/
> s/programatically/programmatically/
> s/recognise/recognize/
> s/UA's/UAs/ (to be consistent with the majority)
I couldn't find all of these, and some of them were not incorrect (in
particular the one occurance of "UA's" is currect as it is the singular),
but I have fixed those that I found.
Sorry for UA's and Feburary was in XML normative reference
Is there any other you didn't found ?
> Mohamed
Thanks for your feedback. Could you let me know your full name for the
acknowledgements section?
Mohamed ZERGAOUI
Innovimax AC Rep
Thanks,
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
--
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €
