Art, You are right about R11, I'll update it later today. Marcos
On 2/2/07, Arthur Barstow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim, Marcos, On Feb 1, 2007, at 8:52 AM, ext Jim Ley wrote: > > A couple of notes - I think you brush rather lightly over requirements > related to security APIs e.g. R19 and R11 are only SHOULD and MAY, I'd > like to see widgets fully address this issue of how a widget can > negotiate with a user (through preferences or whatever) access to > different API's. So I'd like to see a MUST here (of course this is a > very difficult requirement, but ...) Regarding R11, as currently written I think this requirement is confusing. The intent seems to be something like: [[ An instance of the packaging format must contain a Manifest Resource [insert link to section 3.2]". The requirements of that resource are defined in section 3.2. ]] Thus I would re-word R11 to something like the above and delete the list since most if not all of them have their own requirement in section 3.2. Regarding R19, Jim - would you please expand on what you mean by "how a widget can negotiate with a user"? I certainly agree Access-Control and Security are important issues. However, as you imply the details here are likely non-trivial. Regards, Art ---
-- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
