Hi Karl,
Thanks for your comments. At the moment, the javascript implementation of
XBL2 that we are working on is a long way from being complete. We'll be sure
to let you (and everyone on this list) know as soon as we make progress on
the primer and on the implementation.
In the mean time, it would be great if you could provide us some more
feedback on the Widgets Requirements Document [1] from a W3C Conformance/QA
point of view.
Kind regards,
Marcos
[1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/Overview.html
On 2/14/07, Karl Dubost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have read the early draft of XBL Primer [1], it seems it will be a
very interesting document.
In the introduction it is said
Please note that at the time of writing
there are no implementations of XBL 2.0,
so everything in this document is
currently untested.
Then you show graphical examples and then there is a "Status of the
XBL 2.0 Implementation"[2] document. It is a bit puzzling.
I'll be happy to read it again when the document is more mature.
[1]: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/waf/XBLPrimer/
Overview.html?rev=1.7&content-type=text/html;%20charset=iso-8859-1
[2]: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/waf/XBLImpl/
XBL_Status.html
PS: I have done a quick outlook to XBL 2, but I didn't have time to
make a deeper 2nd review and the date of the 2nd last call has
passed. So I guess it's too late.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
--
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
