There's informal, unofficial activity (disclaimer: I'm one of the
instigators) on the HTTP WG list to revise RFC2616, but the stated
intent is to get a WG and make it formal. See:
<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/>
Cheers,
On 2007/02/15, at 9:53 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:12:36 +0100, Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
inc.com> wrote:
Can you change to ABNF? If the HTTP changes go through, it's
likely to be to ABNF, not EBNF, since that's the IETF's preferred
flavour.
What do you mean with "If the HTTP changes go through [...]"?
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
--
Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
