On 2007-03-27 15:57:28 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > You mean the following I think: > > [([*.*.example.com], [*.corp.example.com]) > ,([bigboss.corp.example.com], [])]
> (Note the extra * before example.com.) I think it's an open issue whether a "*" matches a label or an arbitrary subdomain. For the sake of argument, I was assuming it to match an arbitrary subdomain. > I agree that this is indeed much easier to address using your > proposal unless we try to go into the "* is less important than > label" thing again which would probably make it more complicated. We were in the "priority" department before; that algorithm *really* wasn't understood by anybody, and the pair approach was the response to that. Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
