This is a response to Bert Bos' review [1] of the Widgets 1.0 Requirements document [2].
COMMENT 8) Ad "manifest": I was expecting the word "metadata" in this paragraph. (Not strictly necessary, just a way to confirm to the reader that that is indeed what the definition talks about.)
The text of section 3.2 has been updated to include the word "metadata". It now reads: "The manifest language would generally allow authors to declare metadata and other properties related to their widget, as well as provide a means to automatically instantiate the widget" -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2007Feb/0131.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-widgets-reqs-20070209/
