Jonas Sicking: > Yes, that is probably how I would interpret the spec now, although it's > not very explicit. This is Option A in my original email. However just > leaving it at that I think would be a severe limitation on what you > could implement using XBL2 since you couldn't keep any private state > while still working with .clone().
You might be able to do it with a UserDataHandler that responds to NODE_CLONED (assuming you have DOM 3 Core). -- Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
