> Only one of these boxes shows a serious problem, IMHO. Alright, you've convinced me. Anyone else in support of Ian's proposal? That is, (in the absence of an etag or other relevant HTTP caching info)* a comparable difference between the version-strings of a local resource and server resource means that the end-user should be appropriately notified that an update to the local resource is available.
* the etag/http caching aspects are still to be fully resolved. Kind regards, Marcos -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
