Phil, Anne and Jonas proposed ISSUE-3:
[[
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/waf/issues/3>
AC: does the AC syntax need to align with POWDER WG?
]]
be Closed via:
Anne: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/
2007Sep/0036.html>
Jonas: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-appformats/
2007Sep/0033.html> [MEMBER]
If you have any input on this proposal please send it to public-
appformats.
FYI, the latest Editor Draft of the Enabling Read Access for Web
Resources spec is available at:
<http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/>
Regards, AB
Begin forwarded message:
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "ext Jonas Sicking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: September 20, 2007 2:16:27 PM EDT
To: Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Web Application Formats WG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ISSUE-3: AC: does the AC syntax need to align with
POWDER WG?
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:52:16 +0200, Web Application Formats Issue
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ISSUE-3: AC: does the AC syntax need to align with POWDER WG?
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/waf/issues/3
Can we close this issue? I'm not sure what the purpose is of just
sharing the syntax. Also, I think we more or less settled on the
syntax at this point unless there are really convincing arguments
for doing it otherwise (which also need to persuade implementors...).
From what I understand this one is actually fixed since we now do
use the same syntax as them?
And if not, I agree that I don't see much value in just sharing the
syntax.
/ Jonas
