On 2007-10-03 23:08:59 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > Hmm.. this isn't really ideal I think as it would be very easy to forget > > to add the 'http://' part and inadvertently end up in the situation Ian > > describes. Could we use the default port of the requesting scheme > > instead? > That seems fine to me. +1 -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
