On 2007-10-09 13:59:55 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > 4. Store the result of an access request check in a table along > with a timeout time from a dedicated HTTP header. Invalidate > this result after the timeout time has been reached. If > there is no timeout time do not store the result.
> I don't think 1 is really an option. I can't really judge the feasability of > 2. 3 seems annoying for debugging. 4 seems relatively easy to specify and > can work on top of the existing HTTP cache for the URI. How is 4 any different from saying "use HTTP caching"? (I might missing the point here...) -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
