On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:20:29 +0100, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, I'm not sure we should recommend this. I wouldn't be surprised
if the Referer-Root header will end up being used for other specs too in
the future. Especially given it's very generic name.
If we really want servers to do this, maybe we should name the header
AC-Referer-root instead?
The server could also simply not put any access-control headers or PIs
in any responses, that would have the same effect.
Agreed.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>