On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:20:29 +0100, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, I'm not sure we should recommend this. I wouldn't be surprised if the Referer-Root header will end up being used for other specs too in the future. Especially given it's very generic name.

If we really want servers to do this, maybe we should name the header AC-Referer-root instead?

The server could also simply not put any access-control headers or PIs in any responses, that would have the same effect.

Agreed.


--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Reply via email to